🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.